Posto nema generalni forum za privatnost, otvorih ovde temu.
Prvo: https://youtu.be/Gl1004Mxjfg (realno, pomesanog sam misljenja, al naginjen na pre da ovo ne sme da bude omoguceno).
Drugo: https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/15/e...ncryption/

Vasa misljenja?

https://digital-defense.io/

U Srbiji i RS nedavno se pojavila knjiga Natalije Kasperski i Igora Ašmanova pod nazivom "Digitalna higijena". Relativno neprimećeno je održana promocija knjige kada je Beograd i Banjaluku posetio Igor Ašmanov. Knjiga je namenjena radu sa decom, a pored raznoraznih tema koje su problematizovane na  forumu "Bezbedan Balkan" autori knjige se bave i psihološkim aspektima u digitalnom okruženju. Posebno izdvajaju teme kao što je nasilje, manipulacija, zavisnost i (po meni i najozbiljnije pitanje) promene strukture intelekta pod uticajem digitalnih tehnologija. Naime kod dece u Rusiji je na osnovu obimnih istraživanja uočeno skraćivanje pažnje, a pojmovno (jezičko) logično mišljenje su menja u pravcu formalno slikovnog uopštavanja.
Zanimljivo je da se u Rusiji aktivno radi na kontroli sadržaja društvenih mreža radi smanjenja stope samoubistvo i masovnih ubistava putem mreže¿ (softvera¿)“ Kribrum" koji "izvlači" podatke sa svih društvenih mreža. Takodje Rusi planiraju da naprave nacionalni internet.
           

Roze za devojčice.  

   

Quote:The case Škoberne v. Slovenia (application no. 19920/20) concerned the proceedings against a former judge and his conviction in 2013 for accepting bribes. His conviction had been based on statements by his two co-defendants who had admitted to being intermediaries and on traffic and location data obtained under the data-retention regime in force at the time in Slovenia.

In today’s Chamber judgment1 in the case the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).

Although only telecommunications data needed for billing and commercial purposes could now be retained in Slovenia, at the time of the applicant’s conviction communication service providers had been obliged to retain such data systematically and indiscriminately for a period of 14 months.

The Court considered that such retention did not remain within the bounds of what was necessary in a democratic society. Consequently, the retention of, access to and processing of the data in the context of the criminal proceedings against the applicant had breached his privacy rights. The Court also held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) (right to a fair trial/right to obtain examination of witnesses) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Court noted that the proceedings against the applicant and his co-defendants had been disjoined following the latter’s admission of guilt and that the applicant had been denied the possibility to put questions to them in court in the separate proceedings against him that ensued. The applicant had therefore been deprived of the opportunity to effectively adduce witness evidence which would have been important in arguing his case, therefore rendering the trial proceedings unfair.

Quote:8.  Telegram Messenger LLP refused to comply with the disclosure order, arguing that it was technically impossible to execute it without creating a backdoor that would weaken the encryption mechanism for all users. It explained, in particular, that the six users mentioned in the disclosure order had switched on the “secret chat” feature and therefore used end-to-end encryption. The company was fined by the Meshchanskiy District Court of Moscow on 12 December 2017. Subsequently, by a judgment of 13 April 2018, the Taganskiy District Court of Moscow ordered the blocking of the Telegram application in Russia. Both judgments were upheld on appeal.

Quote:Policijski službenici Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova, Službe za borbu protiv visokotehnološkog kriminala Uprave za tehniku, u saradnji sa Višim javnim tužilaštvom, Posebnim tužilaštvom za visokotehnološki kriminal na osnovu naredbe Višeg suda u Beogradu, izvršili su pretres stana i drugih prostorija dvadesetogodišnjeg muškarca zbog postojanja osnova sumnje da je u više navrata, tokom 2023. i 2024. godine, putem servisa VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) upućivao preteće pozive američkim bezbednosnim službama, saopštio je MUP.

Dodaje se da su uvidom u računare i računarsku opremu koje je privedeni mladić koristio pronađeni dokazi o izvršenju ovog dela.

On je priveden nadležnom tužilaštvu.